Sulistyanta, Nur Salam, Sebastianus Adi Santoso Mola, Fredyk M. Haba Djingi, Yossie M. L. Jacob, Fatma Ayu Jati Putri

Abstract:

The results of previous studies have detected the great budget needed by a number of State Judiciaries in the archipelagic areas such as NTT in prosecuting 1 (one) case in the Corruption Court of Kupang. These costs generally exceed the limit cost for predetermined prosecution of Rp. 190,000,000,-. In order to deduct this cost through research, there are 2 (two) models of corruption court resulted tentatively-theoretically. They are IT-based corruption courts and conventional sub-region-based corruption court. Each of which has a significant advantage if compared in terms of cost, time and technology. However,the IT-based corruption court model relatively saves more time and money. Therefore, the IT-based sub-region corruption court model is more appropriate to the fast, cheap, and simple judicial principle. These alternative models of corruption court in addition to contributing to the theoretical level for the future development of a justice system, is expected to be a model for the development of the justice system in other archipelagic areas in Indonesia. Trials of IT-based sub-region justice models have been conducted. The results of the trial are concluded to be sufficient to meet the standards of the trial process implementation. There are 2 (two) important obstacles to note: Firstly, infrastructure in terms of bandwidth provision, which is related to the upstream guarantee (data upload speed) and downstream (data download speed). This factor is influenced by the use of radio from transmitters in the region to the user although there is a connection connected from the center through the optical fiber. Secondly, the IT-based sub-region justice process is still debatable (each being debated) regarding its normative juridical basis as well as the accuracy of the judges and participants of the judicial process in attending the trial. The failure to provide the number of HD-Logitechcamera is the significant reason of inaccurate judiciary. This can lead to misinterpretation by the judge in giving a good evaluation of the accused, witnesses and public prosecutors, especially reading “gestures” whether witnesses and defendants have been honest or lying in expressing their testimony and / or their detention before the panel of judges.

Keywords: corruption court, archipelagic area, IT, model

Full Text: PDF