{"id":369,"date":"2018-05-27T16:27:00","date_gmt":"2018-05-27T16:27:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.doarj.org\/ijhrss\/?p=369"},"modified":"2018-05-27T16:29:45","modified_gmt":"2018-05-27T16:29:45","slug":"the-existence-of-community-forest-after-the-enactment-of-law-number-23-year-2014-on-regional-government","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.tdoarj.org\/ijhrss\/the-existence-of-community-forest-after-the-enactment-of-law-number-23-year-2014-on-regional-government\/","title":{"rendered":"THE EXISTENCE OF COMMUNITY FOREST AFTER THE ENACTMENT OF LAW NUMBER 23 YEAR 2014  ON REGIONAL GOVERNMENT"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Zeli Supardiawan,\u00a0Gatot Dwi Hendro Wibowo,\u00a0Sahnan<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Abstract:<\/p>\n<p><em>This study aims to analyze the existence of community forest after the implementation of Law Number 23 Year 2014 on Regional Government. This research is normative law research, Community Forest which hereinafter called HKm is; State forest utilization is primarily aimed at empowering local communities. The empowerment of local communities is an effort to enhance the capability and independence of local communities to benefit optimally and equitably from forest resources through capacity building and access provision in the context of improving the welfare of local communities. Community empowerment is also to overcome the problem of poverty, the community get the assurance of access to manage forest area, HKm able to change the paradigm of centralized forest management, which has caused deforestation, marginalization of community rights, marginalization of culture and poverty, and HKm expected to solve conflicts forestry, by providing access and management rights related to community claims in the forest area, the context of the sustainability of economic transformation, the culture of the community in forest areas that require recognition and certainty. Community Forestry Arrangement and Implementation which is one of the policies of granting forest rights to groups is not actually community-based, Community Forest is a unit of patterns compiled from groups based on modern management, and management models these groups are not recognized by the community in the history of forest management, and the existence of Community Forest after the enactment of Law No. 23 of 2014 is still very far when compared with the Government target that has targeted the achievement of social forest at least 12.7 million hectares until 2019 .<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong><em>Keywords: <\/em><\/strong><em>interim replacement, political parties, the concept of people\u2019s representatives<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Full Text:\u00a0<a class=\"file\" href=\"https:\/\/www.tdoarj.org\/ijhrss\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/IJHRSS\/05\/7.pdf\">PDF<\/a><\/p>\n\n<div class=\"gde-error\">GDE Error: Error retrieving file - if necessary turn off error checking (404:Not Found)<\/div>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Zeli Supardiawan,\u00a0Gatot Dwi Hendro Wibowo,\u00a0Sahnan Abstract: This study aims to analyze the existence of community forest after the implementation of Law Number 23 Year 2014 on Regional Government. This research is normative law research, Community Forest which hereinafter called HKm is; State forest utilization is primarily aimed at empowering local communities. The empowerment of local [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tdoarj.org\/ijhrss\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/369"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tdoarj.org\/ijhrss\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tdoarj.org\/ijhrss\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tdoarj.org\/ijhrss\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tdoarj.org\/ijhrss\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=369"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.tdoarj.org\/ijhrss\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/369\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":374,"href":"https:\/\/www.tdoarj.org\/ijhrss\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/369\/revisions\/374"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tdoarj.org\/ijhrss\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=369"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tdoarj.org\/ijhrss\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=369"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tdoarj.org\/ijhrss\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=369"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}